Skip to main content
Mathovia

Algebra / Polynomial Functions

Partial Fractions

Adding two simple fractions gives one complicated one. Partial fraction decomposition runs that backwards — it takes a single rational expression and splits it into the small pieces it was built from.

Written by
Zohaib
Founder & Mathematics Content Creator
Published

Mathematics verification: Mathematical formulas, calculations, worked examples and solutions are reviewed for accuracy before publication.

Adding and over a common denominator produces . Partial fraction decomposition is that process in reverse: given the messy single fraction, recover the two simple ones. The pieces are easier to work with in almost every setting that matters — series, transforms, and integration all prefer them.

Partial Fractions — key formula
Key formula

What Is a Partial Fraction?

A partial fraction is one of the simple pieces a complicated rational expression breaks into — a single term whose denominator is one factor of the original denominator. Finding those pieces is called partial fractions decomposition, and it is the only thing this lesson does.

and are the partial fractions of .

Nothing is approximated. The sum equals the original for every value of where both sides are defined — it is the same expression, written in a more useful shape.

The Degree Check Comes First

Partial fractions only apply to a proper rational expression — one whose numerator has a strictly lower degree than its denominator.

ExpressionNumerator degreeDenominator degreeProper?
yes
no
no

If it is not proper, run polynomial long division first. The quotient stays as it is and only the remainder fraction gets decomposed.

Example of the fix. For , division gives:

Now the leftover piece is proper, and only needs splitting.

Partial Fraction Decomposition Rules

Factor the denominator completely, then read one rule per factor. Every factor of the denominator contributes its own term or terms to the sum.

Factor in the denominatorTerms it contributes
, appearing once
, repeated
, irreducible
, repeatedone term per power, each with a linear numerator
Table of partial fraction decomposition rules: linear, repeated linear, irreducible quadratic and repeated quadratic factors
One rule per factor type — the whole method fits in four rows

A repeated factor needs every power, not just the highest. Writing only for throws away a degree of freedom, and the constants will not solve.

“Irreducible” means irreducible over the real numbers. Check the discriminant: has , so it stays whole. But has discriminant , so it must be split into before you write any terms — see factoring polynomials if the factoring itself is the sticking point.

The Method in Four Steps

StepWhat you do
1Check the degree; divide first if the fraction is improper
2Factor the denominator into linear and irreducible quadratic pieces
3Write the decomposition form, with a lettered constant for each term
4Clear denominators and solve for the constants

For step 4 there are two ways to finish, and they can be mixed freely:

  • Substitute convenient values. Each root of the denominator kills all but one constant, giving it in a single line. This is fastest for distinct linear factors.
  • Compare coefficients. Expand both sides and match the coefficient of each power of . This is what you need when a quadratic factor leaves constants that no substitution isolates.

Worked Example: Two Distinct Linear Factors

Decompose .

Step 1 — degree check. The numerator is degree , the denominator degree , so the fraction is proper.

Step 2 — the denominator is already factored, into two distinct linear factors.

Step 3 — write the form, one constant per factor:

Step 4 — multiply through by to clear the denominators:

Substitute , which kills the term:

Substitute , which kills the term:

One rational expression splitting into two simpler fractions, with the substitution that finds each constant
Each root of the denominator isolates one constant

Always check by recombining. Here , which matches the original numerator. That one line catches almost every arithmetic slip.

Worked Example: A Repeated Linear Factor

Decompose .

Step 1 — the form gets a term for each power of the repeated factor:

Step 2 — clear denominators by multiplying through by :

Step 3 — substitute :

Step 4 — compare the coefficients of . On the left it is ; on the right it is :

Only one substitution was available here, because the denominator has a single root. Coefficient comparison finished the job.

Worked Example: An Irreducible Quadratic Factor

Decompose .

Step 1 — has discriminant , so it is irreducible and takes a linear numerator:

Step 2 — clear denominators:

Step 3 — substitute , the only real root available:

Step 4 — expand the right side and collect powers:

Power of Left sideRight sideGives

The constant row repeats what substitution already gave, which is exactly the redundancy you want — it confirms the other two rows.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Skipping the degree check. An improper fraction produces an inconsistent system, and the usual reaction is to hunt for an arithmetic error that is not there.
  • Giving a repeated factor one term. needs three terms, with denominators , and .
  • Putting a constant over a quadratic. An irreducible quadratic takes on top, not . One constant is not enough to match both a linear and a constant term.
  • Leaving a factorable quadratic whole. looks like a quadratic factor, but it is and belongs in the linear rules.
  • Forgetting to factor the denominator completely. The rules apply to fully factored denominators; a half-factored one gives a form that cannot be solved.
  • Not checking the answer. Recombining the pieces takes one line and confirms every constant at once.

Practice Problems

Work each before opening the answer.

Problem 1. Decompose .

Show answer

Step 1 — write the form:

Step 2 — clear denominators:

Step 3 — substitute :

Step 4 — substitute :

Answer: .

Problem 2. Write the decomposition form for . Do not solve for the constants.

Show answer

Step 1 — is a repeated linear factor, so it needs two terms.

Step 2 — is a distinct linear factor, so it needs one.

Step 3 — has discriminant , so it is irreducible and takes a linear numerator.

Answer:

Five constants for a degree- denominator — the count always matches.

Problem 3. Why can not be decomposed as it stands?

Show answer

Step 1 — compare degrees. The numerator is degree and the denominator is degree .

Step 2 — the fraction is improper, so the degree check fails.

Answer: divide first. Long division gives , and only the remainder fraction is decomposed.

Problem 4. Decompose .

Show answer

Step 1 — a repeated linear factor needs both powers:

Step 2 — clear denominators:

Step 3 — substitute :

Step 4 — compare the coefficients of :

Answer: .

Problem 5. Decompose .

Show answer

Step 1 — is irreducible, so it takes a linear numerator:

Step 2 — clear denominators:

Step 3 — substitute :

Step 4 — compare the coefficients of , then the constants:

Answer: . A zero constant is a perfectly good answer, not a mistake.

Problem 6. A student treats as an irreducible quadratic factor. What went wrong?

Show answer

Step 1 — check the discriminant:

Step 2 — a zero discriminant means a repeated real root, so the quadratic factors.

Answer: , a repeated linear factor. It contributes , not a single term with a linear numerator.

Decomposition is where the algebra of this chapter meets the rest of mathematics: the pieces it produces are exactly the forms that rational functions are analysed through, and the same splitting turns an otherwise intractable integral into a sum of routine ones. Everything it relies on — factoring, long division, and comfort with rational expressions — is already in this chapter.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is partial fraction decomposition?+

It is the reverse of adding fractions. Instead of combining and over a common denominator, you start with the combined fraction and recover the two simple pieces. The result is algebraically identical to what you started with, just written as a sum.

What are the rules for partial fraction decomposition?+

Three rules cover every case. A distinct linear factor contributes one term . A repeated linear factor contributes one term for every power from to . An irreducible quadratic contributes a term with a linear numerator, . Before any of that, the numerator's degree must be lower than the denominator's.

What do I do if the numerator has the higher degree?+

Divide first. Use polynomial long division to write the expression as a polynomial plus a proper remainder fraction, then decompose only the remainder part. Skipping this step makes the constants unsolvable — the system of equations comes out inconsistent.

How do I know whether a quadratic factor is irreducible?+

Check the discriminant . If it is negative the quadratic has no real roots, so it cannot be factored further and takes a linear numerator. If it is zero or positive, factor it into linear pieces first — a quadratic you could have factored must be factored.

Related lessons